A Denmark-based man has been found guilty of sharing sexually explicit scenes from protected movies and television shows on the social media site Reddit.
According to a police document reviewed by media outlets, the anonymous individual posted 347 clips of nude content in a subreddit he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million times.
The country's police confirm he has been handed a 7-month deferred sentence for copyright infringement.
Experts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked provision in Denmark's copyright law, with the judge ruling that by taking the scenes out of their intended setting, the accused had damaged the performers' "ethical entitlements".
He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted data.
From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips including over 100 female performers.
He shared them in the subreddit he was a moderator of.
According to the Denmark's copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his online community had more than 6,000 members and users were prompted to ask for clips of specific performers.
In 2023, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the impacted actors, directors and producers, which resulted in the subreddit being shut down.
Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the actresses whose explicit scenes were circulated in the community, explained to local media at the period she felt there was a distinction between appearing unclothed in a movie and appearing on Reddit.
The performer stated the posts amounted to "exploitation".
The defendant was arrested in fall 2024 and admitted culpable to the charges last month.
In a comment following the verdict, TRA head the organization's leader remarked the outcome sent an "significant" message "that infringements of artists' entitlements has consequences".
The ruling is viewed as unique in the country for its application of the "moral rights" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist's work cannot be utilized in a manner which violates their standing.
Intellectual property expert a legal scholar informed the media the case was "rare" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.
The extent to which the ruling could influence nations abroad is unclear.
But she added there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the growth of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of one's work might be compromised much more easily".
A passionate golfer and journalist with over a decade of experience covering PGA tours and equipment innovations.